> On Nov 23, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Mark Moseley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Nov 21, 2013, at 8:56 PM, James Peach <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Nov 21, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Mark Moseley <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Thomas Berger >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I could not reproduce this issue. Could you please post an example of the >> >> regex causing this segfault? >> >> >> >> Also, even if there would be some configuration errors on your part, ATS >> >> should >> >> thrown an error, not a stack trace. So would file a bug at >> >> >> I’m fairly certain this is a duplicate of TS-1590 and to some extent >> TS-1666. I closed this one as a duplicate of TS-1590. >> >> Out of curiosity, why are you using the remap threads? Do you have a remap >> plugin that can block ? > > Nope, just will be doing high volume, Lua-based remapping, so that sounded > like it could be a useful setting. But sounds like I don't need it, since my > Lua code never blocks.
Yeah try without it first. If you experience unacceptable latencies, increase the number of worker threads first. That will give you more Lua states as well. Cheers, -- Leif > > Thanks! >
