Thanks all for your assistance. It is very much appreciated.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2014, at 8:15 AM, Jason Strongman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Is there a way to force certain objects into memory cache, and only > serve those objects from memory cache until time of expiration? I do not > want those objects even dumped to disk. Meaning keep objects in ram cache > and let ram cache eviction policy manage the object's removal. > > > > Currently I have tmpfs file system where I store all my 'ram only' > objects. However, if I can simply direct objects to memory cache based on > something like a cache-control header or something similar, than that would > be more desirable. As opposed to creating a disk cache from tmpfs, then > placing all objects from a certain virtual host into that disk cache(via > hosting.config). > > For now, the only options available it he “RAM disk”. Alan has promised > some good changes in this space, where tiered caching is generalized. I’m > *hoping* this will include allowing for RAM cache only, or at least a > configuration option where certain disk backends are not backed with the > ATS RAM cache. The problem (IMO) with the current setup (provided by > Comcast) is that you can not turn off the ATS RAM cache per disk volume. > Which means, if you have RAM cache enabled, RAM disk volumes will still > consume ATS RAM cache as well. > > — Leif > > >
