Hi, In my case, i want to use trafficserver as a cache proxy; so my application is configured to get data from the server A if no cluster situation. But i'm wondering if it will still works well in the cluster.
You memtioned load-bancing, so does it need a load bance between my application and trafficserver cluster? Or should i deal with it in my application? Yeah, maybe both are fine, anyway, i want my model be as simple as possible. Any suggestions about this? Thanks! 2015-07-29 hzwulibin 发件人：Reindl Harald <[email protected]> 发送时间：2015-07-28 19:34 主题：Re: What's the common usecase of TrafficServer Cluster 收件人："users"<[email protected]> 抄送： Am 28.07.2015 um 13:22 schrieb hzwulibin: > Hi, everyone > Today i setup the TrafficServer cluster. However, i have some questions. > How the cluster supply the service to the client, do we need other > solftware like nginx or haproxy? > Just want to know the most common usecase! > In my thinking now, for example, there are three nodes in the clustre A, > B, C; > Some clients configed to use A, when A is down, those clients lost the > service. > So the clients should config to use all ip of A, B, C, or need a medial > solftware like nginx? > Can anyone say some common usecase here? i don't get "Some clients configed to use A" normally you have an A record returning 3 IP's for load-balancing and nginx don't make sense in the picture because it plays on the same level as ATS itself: a proxy
