Thanks for update I was wondering since there was no .so file in the libexec directory :)

On 2/4/2016 5:23 PM, Sudheer Vinukonda wrote:
Sorry for the typo..

I meant to say,

.....you will *need to* build experimental....



On Thursday, February 4, 2016, 4:17 AM, Sudheer Vinukonda <[email protected]> wrote:

    Prefetch is a deprecated feature (and is unrelated to byte range
    caching, afaict).

    We are using background_fetch plugin to cache full objects in the
    background, on receiving byte range requests.

    
https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/6.0.x/reference/plugins/background_fetch.en.html

    To use background_fetch plugin, you will not build experimental
    plugins and activate the plugin via plugin.config. Please read
    through the documentation on how to build experimental plugins.


    Thanks!


    Sudheer



    On Wednesday, February 3, 2016, 10:47 PM, Muhammad Faisal
    <[email protected]> wrote:

        Hi Sudheer,
        Please guide further I have enabled prefetch in the config and
        uncomment the default html tags:

        CONFIG proxy.config.prefetch.prefetch_enabled INT 1

        Is there any other configuration in addition to the above is
        required? I have found many other configuration which are
        currently not present in my records.config see below:

        proxy.config.prefetch.child_port INT 39679
        proxy.config.prefetch.config_file STRING prefetch.config
        proxy.config.prefetch.default_data_proto STRING tcp
        proxy.config.prefetch.default_url_proto STRING tcp
        proxy.config.prefetch.keepalive_timeout INT 900
        proxy.config.prefetch.max_object_size INT1000000000 <tel:1000000000>
        proxy.config.prefetch.max_recursion INT 0
        proxy.config.prefetch.push_cached_objects INT 1
        proxy.config.prefetch.redirection INT 0
        proxy.config.prefetch.url_buffer_size INT 0
        proxy.config.prefetch.url_buffer_timeout INT 0

        Please guide.

        Thanks
        F.

        On 2/2/2016 5:42 PM, Sudheer Vinukonda wrote:


Reply via email to