Since the storage is a reusable and a shared container where each cached
object is treated equally (Fairness), Reindl has a valid point it will
add overheads to the engine itself and no real life application in
Caching point of view.
--
Thanks
F.
irc: zoot
------ Original Message ------
From: "Reindl Harald" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 2/20/2016 4:01:14 PM
Subject: Re: Limit the storage sizes for a domain or a set of domains
Am 20.02.2016 um 11:18 schrieb Hiroaki Nakamura:
Hi, thanks for your advice.
I am thinking of a service that many users share one cache system.
To be fair between users, I would like to have some quotas on storage
size.
but that makes no sense at all, that's not a fileserver
a proxy cache is transparent and self managed - it don't matter who is
using what amount from the cache - the only interesting question is how
many cache-hits you have and hence leave the server in peace with it's
LRU decisions
2016-02-19 18:58 GMT+09:00 Reindl Harald <[email protected]>:
Am 19.02.2016 um 10:06 schrieb Hiroaki Nakamura:
Is there a way to limit the storage size to be used for a domain or
a
set of domains?
For example:
- example1.com: 10GB
- example2.com: 20GB
- example3.com + example4.com: 30GB
^ the total storage of example3.com and example4.com must be
less
than or equal to 30GB
most likely no and this sounds like premature optimizig for no gain
other
then produce overhead on more than one layer
think again what this would need internally in ATS to work proper and
what
negative imapct would that overhead prodcue instead let LRU do it's
job and
leave it alone
