Am 21.03.2016 um 19:19 schrieb Muhammad Faisal:
OK. But this feature can be added right? May be in future releases. It can improve caching performance by avoiding seek time of disks which increase over the period of time with high disk WR.
but what do you are doing with a 2 GB reponse without a size header in the meantime until you know where to store? buffer it in memory?
------ Original Message ------ From: "Leif Hedstrom" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; "Muhammad Faisal" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: 3/21/2016 9:52:35 PM Subject: Re: Different Cache Disk for different size of objectsOn Mar 18, 2016, at 3:35 AM, Muhammad Faisal <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, Is this possible to allocate a different disk for different object sizes? Below is the scenario I'm trying to implement: Object size <1MB -----> SSD Object Size > 1MB ----> HDD This will improve Caching performance as smaller objects will be served from SSD while larger objects will reside on the HDD.No, not at this point. Part of the issue is that we select “storage” before going to origin, so you don’t know what the size is going to be before you get the response. And at that point, you (currently) can’t move to a different storage / volume. But @amc would know best
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
