A late vote of +1 to keep log collation. Regards, Aaron McClimont
From: Bryan Call [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 30 August 2016 7:47 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 Thank you for all the feedback on this proposal. Log collation support will stay in 7.0.0. -Bryan On Aug 23, 2016, at 2:31 PM, THOTA, REKHA <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Sounds like there’s some significant interest to keep this feature. I would like to emphasize that if we keep this, we expect people to maintain the code, fix bugs and add missing features (such as a way to handle the orphaned logs in some reasonable way). Agreed! Thanks Rekha -----Original Message----- From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 3:27 PM To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 On Aug 23, 2016, at 1:21 PM, THOTA, REKHA <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, We started using log collation feature and it seems to be working well for us. Peter Chou from our team has recently submitted an issue in this area and has been actively working on the fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4475. We want to continue using it and support it as needed. Can we please keep this feature? Sounds like there’s some significant interest to keep this feature. I would like to emphasize that if we keep this, we expect people to maintain the code, fix bugs and add missing features (such as a way to handle the orphaned logs in some reasonable way). I’m encouraged to hear that there is interest in the feature, and good hope that we will see continued development efforts in this area. Cheers, — leif Thanks Rekha -----Original Message----- From: James Peach [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:56 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 On Aug 23, 2016, at 9:37 AM, Bryan Call <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Yes, people in the community are allowed to vote on keeping features. Encouraged :) Details: According to the Apache voting process there are binding and non-binding votes. The binding votes are from PMC members and are the ones that count officially. However, not officially, votes from the community hold a lot of weight. https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> -Bryan On Aug 22, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Shrihari Kalkar <[email protected]> wrote: Okay, I would like to vote for keeping this feature if I am allowed to :) -0 Thanks, Shrihari On 8/22/16, 2:35 PM, "Bryan Call" <[email protected]> wrote: There are a few bugs that are opened around log collation. However, I don¹t think any are major issues. Your feedback is very important in the decision on whether to keep this feature. Simple search on bugs with ³collation² in them: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=pr o ject%2 0%3D%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20 % 22coll ation%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20updatedDate%20DESC <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=p r oject% 20=%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22 c ollati on%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC,%20updatedDate%20DESC> -Bryan On Aug 22, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Shrihari Kalkar <[email protected]> wrote: Hey guys, I really like this feature and we use it quite often. We tried using log collation with pipes but somehow we couldn't get that to work reliably. It would be good to have this around. Have we seen many bugs in this area of code? Is it possible to keep this feature around? Thanks, Shrihari From: Phil Sorber <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, August 22, 2016 at 11:29 AM To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 +0 On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:06 PM James Peach <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Bryan Call <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: There are a few features we are looking to remove in the ATS 7.0.0 release. If you are using these features and require them, please respond to this email. We also need to have people that are willing to invest time and fix some of the bugs for these features. Your feedback is very important! An alternative solution to log collation is to log to a pipe and have an external process take care of log collation. Here is the documentation for log collation: https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/moni t oring/ logging/log-collation.en.html <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/mon i toring /logging/log-collation.en.html> <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/mon i toring /logging/log-collation.en.html <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/mon i toring /logging/log-collation.en.html>> The proposal is to remove the configurations options, statistics, and code for log collation. I thought I thoughi I already replied with similar substance as Leif. This helped a lot when we started with ATS. It does have bugs an misbehaviors (eg. orphan file handling), but I don¹t think the maintenance burden is very high. +0 J
