> On May 8, 2020, at 2:17 PM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 8, 2020, at 12:29 PM, Alan Carroll <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Consider a situation with option (1) with two remap rules:
>> 
>> map http://example.one <http://example.one/> http://example.one 
>> <http://example.one/> @plugin=txn_box.so @reloadable=false blah blah blah
>> map http://example.two <http://example.two/> http://example.two 
>> <http://example.two/> @plugin=txn_box.so @reloadable=true blah blah
>> 
>> Does that DSO get reloaded on a reload of "remap.config"?
> 
> 
> It should get reloaded for the second, not for the first. As far as I 
> understand, this is fine, the Gancho made the code such that as long as 
> something uses some version of a plugin, it will be kept forever.

Now, if this gets too complicated (but I don’t see why, the old remap is still 
available when the new one is being created), I’d say produce an Error().

— Leif

> 
> — Leif
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 9:58 AM Sudheer Vinukonda <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Ah, true. I get the misunderstanding now. Yeah, I don’t mean to have 
>> reloadable flexibility per remap line either, but just per “(remap)plugin”.
>> 
>> And the only point I was trying to make was to let that the flexibility be 
>> determined by the user and not implicitly by the fact that a plugin was used 
>> in mixed mode. And yeah sorry, I totally missed the problem with making it a 
>> remap level param instead of a plugin level param. So, I still prefer your 
>> approach 1, except it’d be clearer if it’s named something more obvious 
>> indicating non-reload ability than “@global” (but, naming is hard and I 
>> can’t think of a short/succinct better name :()
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 8, 2020, at 7:33 AM, Alan Carroll <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sudheer, I understand the point you are making, I just consider it 
>>> irrelevant. Let me give Leif an example to illustrate why - TxnBox. It 
>>> shares data between the global and remap configurations at run time via 
>>> static variables. If you enable remap DSO reloading for TxnBox, it will 
>>> crash on the first transaction that hits a remap rule. It doesn't matter if 
>>> it's actually been reloaded or not. However your organization does plugin 
>>> updates, TxnBox will still crash in that situation. Even in your example, 
>>> Sudheer, there's no _choice_ about whether a particular plugin can be DSO 
>>> reloaded, it's a result of the implementation. As you yourself write, you 
>>> can't enable it for those plugins without changing the code. No 
>>> configuration cleverness will get around that.
>>> 
>>> For plugins that do support DSO reloading, the enablement is still per 
>>> plugin, not per remap rule. Moreover, if we went with option (3) it would 
>>> be simple to have to plugin support a configuration / load time option to 
>>> enable or disable DSO reloading. In general, if the plugin can be DSO 
>>> reloaded, it's unclear why it shouldn't be except in unusual circumstances 
>>> which are depending on the plugin implementation.
>>> 
>>> For Sudheer, I remain unclear on what exact flexibility you want, given the 
>>> constraints created by a specific plugin's implementation. I've re-read 
>>> your note and AFAICT it assumes doing DSO reload or not *per plugin*, which 
>>> is also my point. I dislike (1) because it makes no sense to me to have 
>>> this change between remap rules for a specific plugin. I think it's better 
>>> to have the plugin decide if that's possible and, if needed, provide 
>>> configuration to disable it if needed. Speaking specifically for TxnBox, I 
>>> must forbid you from enabling DSO reloading. Even in your case, it might be 
>>> reasonable to have this for plugins that you have not yet updated (which is 
>>> actually the case with TxnBox - I'm limited by a requirement for ATS 7 
>>> compatibility, so I can't change that feature at the current time).
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:11 PM Leif Hedstrom <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 7, 2020, at 8:12 PM, Alan Carroll <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Leif;
>>>> 
>>>> If the plugin can be global or remap but not both, I don't see why (2) 
>>>> limits anything. The entire issue is irrelevant for such plugins, because 
>>>> the situation of reloading the remap DSO but not the global cannot occur, 
>>>> In fact, option (3) or (4) would enable detecting this and issuing a 
>>>> warning.
>>> 
>>> Ah yes, good point. However, still the same problem, one can very much want 
>>> to use say header_rewrite as both global and remap plugin at the same time, 
>>> and be fine with the fact that it doesn’t reload as a “global”, but you 
>>> want it to reload as a remap. We use that plugin in this way for example. 
>>> 
>>> I still feel that option 2) is a bad option, but I’m ok with the others 
>>> (still with a preference towards #1). I think a finer granular control 
>>> mechanism here is a good idea.
>>> 
>>> I’d also be curious to hear which of the core plugins are having problems 
>>> here, in most cases, there’s a no dependency between the global 
>>> instantiation, and the per remap instantiation. Sudheer and LinkedIn have 
>>> many internal plugins that do experience this problem however, so I’m 
>>> guessing that maybe you have similar custom internal plugins?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> — Leif
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Approach (1) was my first thought, but I think the problem there is 
>>>> whether the plugin can work as a global and a reloadable remap is a 
>>>> property of the plugin implementation, not any particular remap rule. That 
>>>> is, for a specific plugin, there's really no choice about whether to use 
>>>> "@plugin" or "@global" - the configuration must get it right or the plugin 
>>>> crashes. Every time. Every rule. It is for this reason I disagree with 
>>>> Leif's view the user should decide. The user's opinion is irrelevant - the 
>>>> plugin works in this mode, or it doesn't. And as our friends at LinkedIn 
>>>> discovered, some rather basic C++ decisions (such as using static 
>>>> variables) will prevent a plugin from working in this mode. On the other 
>>>> hand, if the plugin uses the "User Args" feature then it can work, in 
>>>> which case what's the point of disabling the DSO reload? Unless the plugin 
>>>> implementor is concerned about code skew between the global and remap 
>>>> versions, which again the user is not qualified to decide.
>>>> 
>>>> My personal preference is (3), but I suspect after mysterious crashes with 
>>>> plugins, we will have been happier with (4).
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 7:42 PM Sudheer Vinukonda 
>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> +1 on the general idea to make the reloadability customizable per plugin.
>>>> 
>>>> However, I think it'd be more simple, cleaner and intuitive to not tie it 
>>>> to whether or not a plugin is used both as a global and remap plugin.
>>>> 
>>>> In other words, approach (1) below but, instead of calling it "@global", 
>>>> we could add a param which says "@reloadable=false" (the default value for 
>>>> "@reloadable" can be "true").
>>>> 
>>>> The same param can then be used, when we eventually add relodability to 
>>>> global plugins as well.
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thursday, May 7, 2020, 05:24:09 PM PDT, Alan Carroll 
>>>> <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> As part of the ATS 9 upgrade, a feature was added so that remap plugins 
>>>> could have their DSO reloaded. This means not just the configuration, but 
>>>> the implementation itself. While very useful, this has some unfortunate 
>>>> side effects with plugins that are used in both a global and remap 
>>>> context. To alleviate this, a configuration variable as added to disable 
>>>> the feature.
>>>> 
>>>> Although reasonable, this is a rather heavy handed way to deal with the 
>>>> problem. What would be better is the ability to reload the DSO or not on a 
>>>> per remap plugin basis. I have a few ways this could be done:
>>>> 
>>>> 1) Add the keyword "@global" to "remap.config". This would behave exactly 
>>>> as "@plugin" except it would prohibit reloading of the DSO for that plugin.
>>>> 
>>>> 2) Have the remap reload configuration check to see if the plugin is also 
>>>> a global plugin and disable remap DSO reload for that plugin.
>>>> 
>>>> 3) Add a flag to the global plugin registry information which can be set 
>>>> during TSPluginInit which disables DSO reloading for that plugin, should 
>>>> it occur in "remap.config". This is similar to (2) but requires a  plugin 
>>>> to prohibit DSO reloading. The call woud be TSPluginDSOReloadEnable(flag) 
>>>> and would only be valid when called from TSPluginInit.
>>>> 
>>>> 4) As (3), except the flag is set by default and must be cleared to enable 
>>>> DSO reloading in "remap.config".
>>>> 
>>>> I'm willing to see if I can make this work, but I would like to have some 
>>>> feedback on the preferred approach first.

Reply via email to