On 7/27/07, Mark van Leeuwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I saw that method but the member variable dateField (having class > DateTextField) within DateTimeField is private and there is no getter for it > so I cannot change the pattern. > > At this point it looks like I would have to clone DateTimeField so I can > make the change.
I added overridable method newDateTextField to both DateField and DateTimeField so that you can provide construct the date text field in your own way. Type is still DateTextField though. I didn't see a big advantage to being more generic than that. Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
