Well, I guess we kind of expect the page to be utf-8 encoded, as that
is most common case. Is there any special reason why you can't send
your page as utf-8? That way the javascript would be encoded correctly
(it would match the page).

-Matej

On 8/2/07, Stefan Simik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I search old discussion, but I cannot find answer.
>
> We use a DatePicker component from wicket.extensions.
> This component has many *.js files for localization (we use Slovak locale ->
> calendar-sk-utf8.js )
> Problem is, that these files are written using UTF-8 encoding.
>
> Header contribution:
> <script type="text/javascript"
> src="/udzs/run/resources/wicket.extensions.markup.html.datepicker.DatePickerSettings/lang/calendar-sk-utf8.js"></script>
> does not reflect this encoding, and diacritics in DatePicker is broken.
> When I manually change character encoding to UTF-8 in browser, it's good.
>
> It's possible to solve this problem in Wicket or I have to write some
> servlet filter,
> which adds HTTP header: "Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=UTF-8"
> for *.js requests ? or any alternative ideas ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/DatePicker-localization-%28*.js%29-files-are-in-UTF-8---problem-with-diacritics-tf4205759.html#a11963261
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to