On 8/15/07, juliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2. AJAX components (Wicket vs. ZK) > From the demo websites, it seems ZK provided more AJAX components than > Wicket. (As I haven't worked deeply with Wicket, it could be Wicket either > provided more components or easy to write those components.) But I am > wondering is it easy to use Wicket to implement features like drag and > drop, > date picker...
you do not implement features like drag and drop or datepicker in wicket, instead you wrap javascript libraries that implement those features with wicket components. i am attaching an example of this. it is a calendar component that wraps the yui calendar. it isnt a datepicker because it doesnt popup, it simply embeds into the page, but it should give you some idea of how this is done. the code can be a lot less complex because this calendar implements date-highlighting via ajax as you page through it. wicket also has datepicker in wicket-datetime module and in wicketstuff-calendar. i think there are drag and drop wrappers for dojo and scriptaculous in wicketstuff-dojo and wicketstuff-scriptaculous modules. 3. Target application (Wicket) > There is a trend to move from multi-page application to single-page > application (or a few pages which much lesser than traditional page-based > web application) using AJAX. As far as I know, Wicket is a component-based > framework and very OO, which means the components could be well reused and > maintained, but is it easy to build such single-page application? Would > one > or a few more page classes be very large? like you say, wicket is component oriented. it doesnt really care how you build your app: many pages or a single page. at my day time job we have an app that is mostly a single page with a lot of component replacement. works just fine. 4. Integration (Wicket) > How about using Wicket together with existing JSF application? how about it? i dont see why you would want to integrate a ui framework with another ui framework. in the end what you should do is write a small app using both frameworks to get a feel for them. -igor Any suggestion on comparing the two freamworks is welcome! > > Thanks! > Julie > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-vs.-ZK-tf4276516.html#a12172596 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
calendar-init-template.js
Description: JavaScript source
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
