I guess most of us share your view on this. But these things has evolved. wicket-ajax.js also started as some "simple" functions. If you create an issue for it in JIRA, we have it so we don't remember it. If you even attach a patch I'm sure it will be addressed. :)
Frank On 8/27/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It is not a bug. It is a kind of RFE or a request for usage of best > practices > when coding client-side code. I was curious if you share the same > thoughts. > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > > > > file a bug and preferrably create a patch. > > > > -igor > > > > > > On 8/27/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> I've noticed that wicket-extension components (for instance palette.js) > >> pollute the js namespace. Wouldn't it be better to create a namespace > for > >> them? Something like this would be pretty: Wicket.Extensions.Palette. > >> > >> This proposal is valid for any other components which contribute with > js > >> files. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> Thank you! > >> Alex. > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/JS-space-pollution-in-wicket-extensions-tf4333870.html#a12343022 > >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/JS-space-pollution-in-wicket-extensions-tf4333870.html#a12356503 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
