No Igor. Software is never personal. war is personal, dying of my mother, 
father and youg brother bombed by army aircraft is personal but software sure 
not ;-)

If you can point me please to ANY of the disrespect sentences, except AL`s 
\"why are you still bitching about it\" please do it ... :-)

Robo


----- Originálna Správa -----
Od: \"Igor Vaynberg\"  
Komu:  
Poslaná: 06.09.2007 19:36 
Predmet: Re: Re: Wicket libraries

> 
> On 06 Sep 2007 17:35:26 +0200 (CEST), Robo  wrote:
> >
> > Stop it now please Al. You take oo personal aproach. Nobody forced you in
> > responding.
> 
> 
> heh, what you have to understand is that wicket is oss - so it IS personal.
> it is something we work on in our spare time so it is kind of a hobby (a
> demanding hobby). we do care about it a great deal. constructive criticism
> is always welcome, but you have to have a level of respect on the lists.
> 
> You make Wicket And I`m the user. If you do not like it do not do it. But
> > there is some responsibilities about product you develop towards product
> > users so do not confuse roles please.
> 
> 
> wrong again. its the other way around. if you do not like it do not use it.
> we do not owe you anything. we put wicket out there for people to use, no
> strings attached.
> 
> And besides that I`m also kind of customer As I paid for the book ;-)
> 
> 
> you paid for the book, but we get nothing from that. so how do you connect
> the dots?
> 
> And besides that I several times said how Wicket is great is that not enaugh
> > for you? :-))
> 
> 
> thank you.
> 
> And btw I thanked to Gvyn at the end of my troubles as his responcese solved
> > them. I do not thank before my troubles gets solved ;-) I`m not teacher in
> > the dance school.
> 
> 
> its not the missing thank you, it is more your superior attitute and your
> lecturing tone. so in fact you do come across as a teacher.
> 
> What I`m doing now is preparing presentation to my chiefs and currrently I`m
> > coping with five frameworks amking demo apps and have two weeks for it. That
> > is Why I`m not writing wiki and that is why I`m sometimes upset about lack
> > of docs, working 18-20 hours per day ...
> 
> 
> sounds like your chiefs are pretty dumb if they expect you to learn five
> frameworks in two weeks, find a better job.
> 
> as for the issue at hand, i believe the velocity initializer should be
> rewritten to check if whatever it needs is actually on the classpath, and
> noop quietly if its not. please file a jira issue.
> 
> 
> 
> -igor
> 
> 
> Java jars are nto at all complex beast. They become tricky in situation
> > where you just put some of them inclasspath and they do what you normally do
> > not expect. Lib should be lib and when not called by developer they should
> > do nothing. Deliberatly breaking this rule makes the jars, beast ... :-)
> >
> > So Finishing this personal thread and thank you for much of your time ;-))
> >
> > Robo
> >
> >
> > ----- Originálna Správa -----
> > Od: Al Maw
> > Komu:
> > Poslaná: 06.09.2007 17:44
> > Predmet: Re: Wicket libraries
> >
> > > Robo wrote:
> > > > Ok, seems removing \\\\\\\"wicket-velocity-1.3.0-beta3.jar\\\\\\\" from 
> > > > build
> > > > path solved problem with velocity problem. But please explain me why
> > > > removing package from build path solves the problem if nowhere in my
> > > > Hello World code i call for any of the velocity packages. Is there
> > > > some duplicities in packages or what?
> > >
> > > I expect because Wicket looks on the classpath for Wicket modules to
> > > initialise, finds some in that JAR, tries to and then can\\\'t find one of
> > > its dependencies.
> > >
> > > Modern Java apps tend to be complex beasts, with lots of dependencies.
> > > If you insist on managing these manually, you can expect to have a fair
> > > bit of work to do. That\\\'s why things like Ivy and Maven 2 were
> > invented.
> > >
> > > > As to Maven2. It seems that like you in some way force developers to
> > Maven2. :-)
> > >
> > > No, not at all. But if you\\\'ve deliberately chosen to manage your
> > > dependencies manually when there are perfectly good ways of doing it
> > > automatically, then we\\\'re not going to hold your hand for you. We
> > don\\\'t
> > > get paid to do this, you know.
> > >
> > > If you don\\\'t like Maven 2 no one is forcing you to use it. Use Ivy
> > > instead. Or use the standalone Maven 2 Ant tasks for doing dependencies.
> > >
> > > Alternatively, install Maven 2, use it to build a quickstart WAR file
> > > with all the things you need, and then grab the JARs from there.
> > >
> > > Any of these options would take you a tenth of the time you\\\'ve spent
> > > bitching on this mailing list.
> > >
> > > > Yes Maven solves you some problems with dependecies and also si
> > > > suitable for small project but at big projects it definitely fails.
> > > > :-/
> > >
> > > So Geronimo is a small project? And Jetty? And Apache Directory Server?
> > > And Wicket for that matter? And the several-hundreds-of-thousands-of-
> > > lines, 200+ dependencies projects we have here that use it? Jeez - I may
> > > have a high horse, but yours is scraping the stratosphere. Sure, it has
> > > some issues, but so does anything complex.
> > >
> > > The simple point is that for most people, Ivy or Maven 2 do what they
> > > want it to do. If you don\\\'t like any of these automated tools and
> > insist
> > > on doing it all manually, you can\\\'t expect us to have all that much
> > time
> > > for you, as we don\\\'t get paid to do this, you know. It\\\'s like 
> > > you\\\'re
> > > complaining that there\\\'s no documentation on how to hammer in a nail
> > > using a screwdriver.
> > >
> > > > So please. I know you have lot of work with wicket, and as users can
> > > see you have a good aproach. But please do spend some time to at least
> > > write one chapter about libraries, neede dependencies and so on. If you
> > > have licensing problems just make one clear site with core libs link,
> > > dep libs link and explanation what feature they are enabling and so on.
> > > And make some quick start page in which you explainn dependecies on
> > > simple sample app :-)Do not take alibistic aproach of hiding everithing
> > > besides Maven. :-)
> > >
> > > Why don\\\'t you write a wiki page for us?
> > >
> > > Despite the fact I\\\'m not being paid to be your tech support, I\\\'ve
> > taken
> > > some time out to give you a text file exhaustively detailing the
> > > required dependencies for each of our modules, including the transitive
> > > ones. I have done the work for you (not that you\\\'ve even murmured a
> > > thank you), so why are you still bitching about it?
> > >
> > >
> > > Al
> > > --
> > > Alastair Maw
> > > Wicket-biased blog at http://herebebeasties.com
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________
> > Svetova kniznica SME - literarne klenoty 20. storocia -
> > http://knihy.sme.sk/
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 


__________




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to