you mean when you add Image using ajax it doesnt show up?
being able to refresh something and it "not working" are two very different
things. if you have a nonversioned page and Image in it you will have the
exact same behavior because the url will remain stable - does that mean
Image is broken in nonversioned pages? no! sometimes you want this behavior,
that is why we provide NonCachingImage for the times when you dont.
-igor
On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I know(and agree), but I just feel that we should somehow warn people
> that image won't work with ajax?
>
> regards Nino
>
> Matej Knopp wrote:
> > Again, try using NonCachingImage instead of Image. I does exacly what
> > the suggested fix does. I just overlooked it.
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
> >> solutions described.
> >>
> >> Should I provide a quickstart?
> >>
> >> regards Nino
> >>
> >> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >>
> >>> as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image
> that
> >>> is not cached use NonCachingImage.
> >>>
> >>> -igor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 9/9/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at
> least
> >>>> something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
> >>>> valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it
> in
> >>>> your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could
> be
> >>>> nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
> >>>>
> >>>> regards Nino
> >>>>
> >>>> Matej Knopp wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds
> could
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> do ;)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> -Matej
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they
> the
> >>>>>> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish
> between
> >>>>>> requests, not within one.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100
> images.
> >>>>>>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long
> than
> >>>>>>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Matej
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same
> client/session?
> >>>>>>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> johan
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Actually we discussed that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> millisecond.. As
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated
> in
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> concerned
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> use nanotime.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
> >>>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> >>>>>>>>>>> Math.random());
> >>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> >>>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> >>>>>>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> >>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up
> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> feature
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ::
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> request to
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image
> (I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> thought
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason
> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> that
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax
> call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> >>>>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> >>>>>> Get it now:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
