this has been my experience. anecdotal evidence and experience tells me that wicket itself is exceptionally fast. fast enough that your DB will definitely be the bottleneck and not by a bit, but by an order of magnitude. 1000/rps vs. 100rps kind of thing.
Johan Compagner wrote: > > What do you mean with Scaling? > Wicket scales pretty well. because we fully support clustering out of the > box. > So you can add just add new servers. > > Wicket it self is fast, the database would be much more of a bottleneck. > > johan > > > On 9/19/07, Lowell Kirsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> For work I'm trying to use wicket, but my boss wants to be reassured >> that it will scale well. Can anyone point me to any sources (not >> anecdotes) about how well wicket scales? And yes, I know my question >> is vague, but right now, so are our requirements. >> >> Thanks, >> Lowell >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket-scalability-tf4479322.html#a12791020 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
