/me goes back to writing about RadioGroup
On 10/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say go with RadioGroup, that is what it is intended for.
>
> The RadioChoice is intended for quick solutions, do you want more
> possibilities, use the Group.
>
> And you can just use a RepeatingView inside the Group to dynamically
> generate the Radio's
>
> Martijn
>
> On 10/5/07, Clay Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am trying to customize RadioChoice so that it puts the options into a
> > nice table. I found setPrefix and setSuffix, but I cant just do
> > setSuffix(" ") because I want to have a differenct prefix & suffix
> > based on the index (for example create a new row in a table for every
> > 4th option).
> >
> >
> >
> > getPrefix and getSuffix are final methods, so I can't override them.
> > Does anyone know of a way that I can accomplish this task using
> > RadioChoice? Or will I have to go with a RadioGroup ...I'd rather have
> > the list of options generated dynamically than from the HTML, if
> > possible.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for any help!
> >
> > -Clay
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
