Another idea for RFE: Also I've noticed that when wicket:enclosure does not change the visibility of ALL its child components (only the specified one), this causes unexpected results.
Example: <wicket:enclosure child='child1'> <div wicket:id="child1"></div> <div wicket:id="child2"></div> </wicket:enclosure> In this case, I would expect that if the child1 is not visible, also child2 would not be visible. Unfortunately the actual behavior exactly opposite: child1 is not visible, while child2 is visible. Alex Objelean wrote: > > Currently, wicket does not support nested wicket:enclosure tags. It would > be very useful. What do you think? > > Thank you! > Alex. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--Nested-wicket%3Aenclosure-tf4593044.html#a13131316 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]