Matt Jensen-2 wrote: > > I believe that doing this causes the list to contain one empty, but > still selectable, element. That is what I am trying to avoid--I just > want a plain empty list. I'm starting to wonder whether empty lists are > considered to not be the "Wicket way," as it seems like it should be > easier than this. Does ListChoice *intentionally* not allow for an > empty list? I expected to find something like > "allowEmpty(boolean)"...but no dice. >
Have you tried my code? The list has no selectable entry. ----- -- Kent Tong Wicket tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDW -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Empty-ListChoice-tf4604759.html#a13186476 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
