Thanks Matej for your quick reply, these are stupid questions asked by the team members, who are resisting to implement Wicket. Trying to come up with some issues.
So basically you are telling that session management is not a issue at all in wicket, that's good. Thanks Again! Dummy Matej Knopp-2 wrote: > > Pen wrote / napísal(a): >> I have a few question regarding the wicket usage. we are trying to >> Implement >> wicket as our next MVC framework, Can please someone answer the questions >> below > > Hi >> >> - about session support - wicket stores the render state of most >> renderer's >> in session for different users of the systems. This means large/very >> large >> sessions that need to be supported, means memory crunch, performance >> degradation and implementing the failover at production level really >> hard. > Wicket doesn't store a render state of renderer's (have no clue what > that might be). Wicket stores a component tree of last page in session. > > Btw. this doesn't even sound like a question, it sounds like stating > facts, not to mention that the facts are based on wrong assumtptions. > > Very large sessions? I've seen a model 2 application with sessions over > a megabyte. Usually a wicket page is (unless it's a big one - with lot > of components) around 30kb (of course this is very relative, this just > reflects my experience with most of my wicket based projects). I don't > think a 30kb session results in performance degradation or makes > implementing failover difficult. > >> >> - Also it looks like wicket requires code changes when more pages are >> added >> and each page needs to have separate handler and it can not be done in >> configuration file. This may become an issue when number of pages >> increase >> in future. >> > > What handler? What configuration file? Page has a class that implements > the logic (probably what you mean by "handler"). How is this related to > a config file? Wicket doesn't need any config file. There's no external > plumbing. I fail to see how this results in an issue with increased page > numbers, as the pages are completely independent. > > Also I'm kinda missing a question mark in this question again, which > make it seem like a statement (wrong again as far as I can tell). I'm > not sure if that was intended. > > -Matej > >> Dummy >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Session-Management--tf4721575.html#a13500318 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
