i mean the action should be called VISIBLE instead of RENDER and we
should also have isVisibleAllowed() just like we have
isEnabled()/isEnabledAllowed()
makes more sense?
that way the check in enclosure is:
if (child.isvisible()&&child.isvisibleallowed()) { ...}
-igor
On 11/1/07, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2007 9:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there seems to be a bit of a disconnect between "render" in auth and
> > our general component visibility concept. perhaps it might be an
> > improvement to aligh auth strategy with visibility rather then
> > render...what do others think?
>
> What exactly do you mean by this? Do you want isVisible to also check
> permission for the render action?
>
> Maurice
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
