> > It would be quite feasible to add support for multiple overridden > > sections using the above tag names while remaining backwards compatible > > with existing markup by continuing to support the old <child/extends> > > tags working the way they always have. > > It's kind of a predictable answer, but the best way to push new ideas > forward is to supply us with a patch, so that we can discuss some > working code. The current committers don't see much in the idea, but > that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to support at least the option of > plugging this in. And hey, maybe some working code convinces us :-) > > Eelco
There's nothing I would love more right now than to have to time to implement a patch to support multiple overridden sections in a wicket page but unfortunately time is one thing I don't seem to have much of these days. I can't believe 2007 is almost over - heck, where did this year go? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
