> > Given these subtle problems with this approach, I admit I'm warming to > > the multiple extend/child idea. > > im oposite - if i have X extends in a page, whose extend should be > preferred (e.g: manipulating the head or a part outside of itself) ?
I'm not sure I understand the issue you raise but so please forgive me if I've misunderstood: Presumably you don't have an issue with multiple abstract methods in Java classes? As Java and Wicket only support single inheritance there is no issue as to which base class/page child section is being extended in a derived class/page (that only ever happens in a multiple inheritance paradigm and no one is proposing we go down that path!) - the identifier of an implements in a derived page will only ever resolve to a single abstract tag in a base page. There's no confusion here I don't believe. In Java you name methods carefully and appropriately and the compiler warns you if you have duplicated a function signature. Same would happen in wicket. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
