failover? On 11/16/07, saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Johan Compagner wrote: > > > > On Nov 15, 2007 11:22 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> Recommended is to use sticky sessions. > > > > +10000 > > > > none sticky sessions are flawed anyway.. (or the synchronizing performance > > hit is so great it doesn't make any sense, it it makes sense to start > > with...) > > > > Johan, are you saying that other types of load balancing strategies besides > sticky sessions are all flawed, and that it only makes sense to use sticky > sessions? Please correct my understanding. > > If sticky sessions are the only recommended way to do load balancing, then > what is the reason to support replication of session state across multiple > nodes in a cluster? > > - Lu > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Disabling-serialization-storage-of-pages-in-session--tf4768006.html#a13796491 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-rc1/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
