Now that you have gotten a ton of feedback, I'm interested in if and how you adjusted your pros and cons. And of course how the presentation went. Martijn
On Nov 15, 2007 8:35 PM, mraible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW, I'd like to replace the pros and cons (my opinions) with some that > are > more accurate. As users of Wicket, I'd love to hear from you and get your > opinions on the top 3 pros and cons of Wicket. > > Here's the ones I currently have: > > Pros: > > * Great for Java developers, not web developers > * Tight binding between pages and views > * Active community - support from the creators > > Cons: > > * HTML templates live next to Java code > * Need to have a good grasp of OO > * The Wicket Way - everything done in Java > > IMO, there's no need to debate whether these are valid or not. If they're > not - please suggest new ones. James Ward of Flex had a nice and honest > comment this morning pointing out Flex's cons: > > http://tinyurl.com/yvybnm > > Thanks, > > Matt > > > Sean Sullivan-3 wrote: > > > > fyi > > > > > http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/comparing_jvm_web_frameworks_presentation > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Matt-Raible%27s-ApacheCon-presentation-tf4815955.html#a13780071 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-rc1/
