Hi, the DefaultAbstractTree is included only for backwards compatibility and will be most probably removed in 1.4. I agree that javadoc could be a bit clearer on this.
-Matej On Dec 3, 2007 8:52 PM, jweekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Matej. I think it's OK to go in to this level of detail because at the > AbstractTable level there's some nice design/implementation, so, it is > instructive. I will also explain the Swing side (TreeModel etc) in a bit > more detail. > Of course, the code examples and slides will demonstrate how to use these > trees on web-pages, but because of the aforementioned good-design, it is > pretty easy to use these components and won't take very much time. If we do > have time, and the audience is interested, I'll go on to show the guts and > how it all works under the covers. Either way, I personally find this a good > way to understand how things work. > > While we're on the subject, what's the deal with the trees in the > extensions? I guess there is going to be some rationalisation of the > DefaultAbstractTree class in 1.4 (?); it's not really obvious whether to > subclass BaseTree (from core) or DefaultAbstractTree (from extensions) for > one's own tree implementation, by just looking quickly at the APIs, code or > the javadoc. > > Regards - Cemal > http://jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk > > > > > Matej Knopp-2 wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > the diagram looks ok, however it covers a lot of internal tree state, > > which is something the users shouldn't be botherered with. Are you > > sure you want to go into such details? > > > > -Matej > > > > On Dec 2, 2007 9:39 PM, jweekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I'm preparing a presentation on Trees in Wicket (core) for the > >> http://jweekend.com/dev/LWUGReg/ London Wicket Users Group event on > >> Wednesday. > >> Could someone (Matej maybe ;-) take a quick look over > >> http://jweekend.com/presentation/WicketCoreTrees.png this high level UML > >> class diagram (~1024x768) I have started putting together to explain the > >> inner-workings/key-concepts to go along with the demo-code/slides on how > >> to > >> use these components? > >> Also let me know if you feel this sort of thing is helpful for people > >> learning Wicket. > >> Regards - Cemal > >> http://jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Trees---presentation-diagram-tf4933100.html#a14119659 > >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Trees---presentation-diagram-tf4933100.html#a14137468 > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
