The point is that in the constructor, you're actually instantiating an
anonymous class that *extends* EditForm. It won't work without the
abstract, because the onXXX methods are abstract and need
implementing.
/Gwyn
On 19/12/2007, bryan0101 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have googled this question in many forms without much success. The problem
> is I'm trying to understand the appfuse wicket example. And the only thing
> I'm not getting is the use of private static abstract class inner member
> class.
>
> <code>
> public class UserForm extends BasePage {
> @SpringBean
> private UserManager userManager;
> private final Page backPage;
>
> public UserForm(Page backPage) {
> this(backPage, new User());
> }
>
> public UserForm(final Page backPage, User user) {
> this.backPage = backPage;
>
> // Create and add the form
> EditForm form = new EditForm("user-form", user) {
> protected void onSave(User user) {
> onSaveUser(user);
> }
>
> protected void onCancel() {
> onCancelEditing();
> }
>
> protected void onDelete(User user) {
> onDeleteUser(user);
> }
> };
> add(form);
> }
> ...
> ...
> private void onCancelEditing() {
> setResponsePage(backPage);
> }
> private static abstract class EditForm extends Form {
> private void add(FormComponent fc, IModel label) {
> .....
> </code>
>
> Now I understand inner class, static etc etc... But what is the use of
> abstract in this instant, (all the while instantiating it in enclosing
> class's constructor. Would it work with just private static class?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/In-appfuse-example%2C-UserForm-instantiate-static-abstract-inner-class---tp14425471p14425471.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
