spring web application expects the spring container to be available.
so you need to setup that first and make sure the tester can get to it

-igor


On Jan 8, 2008 2:17 PM, cricdigs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your quick reply. But sorry, not sure what you mean. This is my
> WicketTester:
>
> public class StoreWicketTester extends WicketTester {
>
>   public StoreWicketTester() {
>     super(new StoreApplication());
>   }
> }
>
> And StoreApplication extends SpringWebApplication:
> public class StoreApplication extends SpringWebApplication {
>
> ...
>
> }
>
> And my test invokes thus:
>     final StoreWicketTester wicketTester = new StoreWicketTester();
>
>
>
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
> >
> > for springwebapplication you are used to mean springwebapplicationfactory
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On Jan 8, 2008 2:01 PM, cricdigs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have the same issue. If I use ZeuzGroupApplication.class I get the
> >> known
> >> issue of ClassCastException and  if I use the new ZeuzGroupApplication(),
> >> I
> >> get the following error. Any help will be greatly appreciated...
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >>
> >> java.lang.IllegalStateException: No WebApplicationContext found: no
> >> ContextLoaderListener registered?
> >>         at
> >> org.springframework.web.context.support.WebApplicationContextUtils.getRequiredWebApplicationContext(WebApplicationContextUtils.java:86)
> >>         at
> >> org.apache.wicket.spring.SpringWebApplication.internalInit(SpringWebApplication.java:77)
> >>         at
> >> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.init(WicketFilter.java:511)
> >>         at
> >> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.<init>(MockWebApplication.java:148)
> >>         at
> >> org.apache.wicket.util.tester.BaseWicketTester.<init>(BaseWicketTester.java:204)
> >>         at
> >> org.apache.wicket.util.tester.WicketTester.<init>(WicketTester.java:308)
> >>         at
> >> org.apache.wicket.util.tester.WicketTester.<init>(WicketTester.java:291)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> David Shepherdson-2 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 4 Jan 2008, at 1.19 pm, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Ahh, that might just be it then.. I've just verified it. I guess I
> >> >> used a too general session, as you wrote the stuff passes when using
> >> >> websession. Im gonna close the bug.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for your help.
> >> >
> >> > No probs -- glad there was a good explanation for it in the end!
> >> >
> >> > David
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Wickettester-and-session--tp14459864p14700073.html
> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Wickettester-and-session--tp14459864p14700186.html
>
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to