No, I'm perfectly happy with the functionality provided by the examples on wicketstuff. I just want to make sure they are secure. I don't want to use them if they're giving me a false sense of security.
-----Original Message----- From: C. Bergström [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Type safe roles for AUTH-ROLES? On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 13:51 -0800, Dan Kaplan wrote: > What? Really? F***. Can you please elaborate? Did I waste every second > of the time I spent looking at the examples on wicketstuff? I applied these > examples to my webapp. Did I implement some type of "pretend" authorization > strategy? http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security +Examples Sources are available here.. https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-s ecurity-examples maybe this is more in the ballpark of what you were expecting? ./C --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
