Eelco, I've added another pro to the list I put up, in a fit of ego, so now also have: pro - good security - e.g. just as Java removed pointer arithmetic Wicket doesn't expose property paths, ids etc by default
I think the point about Wicket being good where security is important is very valid but they still seem very keen on JSF (if it is horribly complicated and expensive it must be good!). Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > Hi Sam, > > I'm actually trying to point this out in Wicket In Action. But go > ahead and write a few blog entries ;-) > > Eelco > > On Jan 14, 2008 4:43 AM, Sam Hough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> It has only just struck me how much more secure Wicket is out of the box >> than >> struts, spring, GWT etc. The features list doesn't really seem to drive >> this >> point home... >> >> Maybe add really clear example like: "Equivalent to not having pointer >> arithmetic in Java. e.g. HTTP requests specify which option from a select >> box to use rather than allowing arbitrary values to be sent" >> >> Cheers >> >> Sam >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Shout-more-about-security-advantages-of-Wicket--tp14800934p14800934.html >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Shout-more-about-security-advantages-of-Wicket--tp14800934p14841707.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
