In our apps we always wrap our domain objects in models, not have them implement IModel. There is only 1 exception to this rule and that is because that particular object is not stored in the db but is initialized with loads of other objects. It turned out to be one very complex mofo not something i would recommend.
Maurice On Feb 13, 2008 7:30 PM, mfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Guys, > > I would want to know if using your business/domain objects as wicket models > would be a good idea ? > > i remember in an earlier thread i was suggested not to use business-objects > as wicket models, but it would want to hear more opinions.. > > Thanks in advance.. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Business-Domain-objects-used-as-wicket-model-object---opinions-please-tp15462661p15462661.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
