Doesn't that go against the whole idea of Dependency Injection (the "Hollywood Principle")? Objects needing their dependencies shouldn't have to ask to be injected.
On 2/18/08, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, James Carman wrote: > > Some of the things that I need to have injected aren't being injected > > into "components." For instance, I'm working on an > > In those cases you can do still use @SpringBean from > wicket-spring in that class and call > > InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this); > > in the constructor (or other suitable place) of that > class. > > Best wishes, > Timo > > -- > Timo Rantalaiho > Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
