Out of curiosity, since pages in a Wicket application aren't accessed as directly as something like a JSP might be, what reasoning is there for using an XHTML file extension instead of HTML?
-Brandon MYoung wrote: > > I follow this: > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Use+a+different+extension+for+template+files > > added this to MyPage: > > @Override > public String getMarkupType() { > return "xhtml"; > } > > and it doesn't work. Firefox wants to download the file instead of > showing the page. > http://www.nabble.com/file/p15641885/no-go-xhtml.jpg > > IE7 cannot even download the file. > > What am I doing wrong? > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Howto-use-.xhtml-instead-of-.html-for-template-file-extension-tp15641885p15674567.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
