+1, especially if the site is really shiny, you can understand things
that can be done with the framework and have some inspiration.
On 28/feb/08, at 08:19, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
+1, it also kind of opens up allowing for questions to the site
announced...
regards Nino
Matej Knopp wrote:
I don't think there is anything wrong with posting emails about new
wicket based sites. Not everyone has the time to be checking wiki
pages constantly.
-Matej
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:30 AM, C. Bergström
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 11:22 +0100, Daniel Frisk wrote:
> After a couple of months coding we have released our Wicket
website!
> It has generally been a pleasure porting our jsp site and we
have been
> able to add a lot of functionality as well. Check it out at
http://jalbum.net
I think this sort of enthusiasm is great, but a wiki page 'sites
using
wicket' has been created for this reason. I didn't read the
site, but
[1] is especially slow. I'd definitely profile that page and
make sure
you're both using caching and that your cache is tuned properly.
Success!
./C
[1] http://jalbum.net/skins/
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - mobile: +39 348.150.6941
