Using 1.3.0 - maybe I should try 1.3.1
> -----Original Message----- > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 29 February 2008 6:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Location of wicket-ajax.js > > this should happen automatically, please file a bug report > > -igor > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Chris Colman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Problem found: Was a problem with <script> import lines not being added, > > not that the .js files were not reachable. > > > > Apparently we need to have a stateful component somewhere in the page > in > > order for wicket to auto inject the <script> lines into the HTML for > us. > > > > Is there a way of telling wicket to inject the <script> lines without > > having a stateful component on the page - currently everything on the > > page is stateless - we just have buttons on each item that, when > > pressed, need to bring up an AJAX modal dialog box to display some info > > on the items. > > > > Or do we need to add an invisible edit control or something to get the > > <script> injection happening? > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
