It does not have to be yui or a particular one. I meant to have wicket to ship with many power component that can be easily worked on via java api, whether it uses dojo or yui or ext, it does not really matter. datepicker is just one perfect example that can use different JS lib but created via java api. Hope more would be added.
>We don't prefer one framework over the other. Some like jquery, others >like dojo or prototype/mootools/scriptaculous/rico. Favoring YUI over >the others will put us in a corner. > >Martijn > >On 3/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I saw it but it did not seem to very active. Besides, it would >> be nice that wicket core team adopt a js lib as many frontend >> functions have to use js, like datepicker. It would make sense to >> me to expand it to make wicket more powerful and easy to use. >> >> >> > >> >Have you taken a look at wicket-contrib-yui? >> > >> >There are already a few YUI integrated components built. >> >-- >> >View this message in context: >> >http://www.nabble.com/YUI-integration--tp15793009p15793412.html >> >Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >> > >> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > >-- >Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst >Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released >Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
