What level is this reported to?
Its not error right?
On 3/10/08, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just to follow up on this...
>
> You're right, it does still work. The thing is that during the algorithm
> when the properties of the bean are being tested the entire exception
> stack is being printed out.
>
> This is a bit confusing because it can lead the developer to think that
> an error occurred.
>
>
> I propose to log information instead of printing out the entire
> exception stack. If you agree to this, I don't mind submitting a patch.
>
>
> dml
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 09:38 -0800, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > hmm, this should still work. mind filing a jira bug with a quickstart?
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On Feb 13, 2008 12:00 AM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I'm (finally!) migrating to 1.3, so have a few wrinkles to iron out.
> > >
> > > Is somebody able to tell me the intention of the PropertyModel? I'm
> > > wondering if something has changed, or if I just wasn't using it
> > > correctly before...
> > >
> > >
> > > In one of my panels, I use this type of property:
> > >
> > > PropertyModel languageModel = new PropertyModel( this, "language" );
> > >
> > > And in the same class, I have a getter like this:
> > >
> > > public String getLanguage()
> > > {
> > > return getSession().getLocale().getLanguage();
> > > }
> > >
> > > There is no setter and no "language" property.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This used to work in 1.2.6, but now 1.3.1 complains that there is no
> > > setter for this class.
> > >
> > > Now, I don't even _want_ a setter, but just to see what happens, I add
> > > in a dummy setter, but wicket still complains that it can't find a
> > > "language" property.
> > >
> > >
> > > Am I not using the PropertyModel correctly (i.e. according to what
> > > PropertyModel is intended for)? (If so, this means that I've been using
> > > it incorrectly for many months without noticing, since it used to work.)
> > >
> > > Or, should I be using some other type of model for this?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanx!
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
