Those people who do are still in struts 1.x mode. And thats what ... ? 85%
of the commercial java world ? ... i hear lots of those are moving to JSF
... **sigh** =(



On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I have been surprised that we have not had a single person say that they
> still require 1.4.  Although I was originally against dropping 1.3 if we
> did a quick 1.4 (because I assumed there'd be many who still needed Java
> 1.4), perhaps we should open this up on the users list and get a more
> accurate feel for it.
>
> Judging only by the response on this list, we could release a 1.4 that was
> 1.3 + generics and drop support for 1.3.  But I imagine that there will
> still be some that need Java 1.4.
>
> Jeremy Thomerson
> -- sent from a wireless device
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Scott Swank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Sent: 3/16/08 4:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation
>
> +1 for Java 5 & Generics
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > its binding now...
> >
> >  -igor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >  > +1 (non binding) for a quick x-m1 with only generics release
> >  >
> >  >  Maurice
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >  On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  +1 to java 5
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  atul singh wrote:
> >  >  >  java 5 now definitely
> >  >  >
> >  >  > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, James Carman <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  >  > wrote:
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  On 3/16/08, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  +1 for moving to java 5
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  +1 for moving to Java 5 *quickly* :)
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
>  --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> >  >  > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> additional
> >  >  > commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >
> >  >
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Scott Swank
> reformed mathematician
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 

Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
|| ॐ ||

Reply via email to