+1

although i say this feeling badly about the possibility that mob rule could
make johan's life harder.  in fact, if enough core developers are opposed to
this plan, i think that probably overrules a user vote.  after all the core
developers actually have to do all this work (and for free, i might point
out).

my hope is that a 1.4 release with generics support and dropping 1.3 support
could happen very quickly (a couple weeks plus) if everyone works on it. 
that would be a big win for everyone.  if there are any generic problems
that could use input from me, i'm happy to have a look.

    jon


Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> 
> This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
> your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
> easier.
> 
> The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot of
> folks are anxious for generified models. Most users if not all wish us
> to release a quick release which is 1.3 + generics. The consequence is
> that the core team will stop to support 1.3, and that everybody that
> wishes updates will have to migrate to 1.4, and upgrade to Java 5.
> 
> Everybody is invited to vote! Please use
> 
> [ ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
> [ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
> 
> Let your voices be heard!
> 
> Martijn
> -- 
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16114147.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to