i disagree
i will not check everywhere for isRequired()
that can be done in 1 method
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> i agree with vitaly, johan?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Vitaly Tsaplin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But the javadoc says:
> >
> > public boolean checkRequired()
> > "Checks if the form component's 'required' requirement is met. This
> > method should typically only be called when FormComponent.isRequired()
> > returns true."
> >
> > And I agree with javadoc :)
> > checkRequired () should be called only to know "if the form
> > component's 'required' requirement is met". In case isRequired()
> > returns false this call does not make any sense...
> >
> > Basically if isRequired () returns true you know that a component
> > is required but what you don't know is whether the requirement
> > condition is met or not and so to check it out you call checkRequired
> > (). checkRequired () shouldn't call isRequired () itself.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > it checks if the required needs to be checked and if that is the case
> it
> > > checks if the input is set
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Vitaly Tsaplin <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > checkRequired () itself shouldn't be called at all unless
> > > > setRequired is true...
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Johan Compagner <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > and did you look at checkRequired?
> > > > >
> > > > > public boolean checkRequired()
> > > > > {
> > > > > if (isRequired())
> > > > > {
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Vitaly Tsaplin <
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi guys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > According to the wicket javadoc the method checkRequired ()
> of the
> > > > > > FormComponent class "...should typically only be called when
> > > > > > isRequired() returns true."
> > > > > > But it seems to be different...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > public final void validate()
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > validateRequired(); <<<--------------------
> here
> > > > > > if (isValid())
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > convertInput();
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (isValid() && isRequired() &&
> > > > > > getConvertedInput() == null &&
> > > > > > isInputNullable())
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > reportRequiredError();
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (isValid())
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > validateValidators();
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > protected final void validateRequired()
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > if (!checkRequired())
> <<<--------------------- and
> > > > here
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > reportRequiredError();
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As you can see the checkRequired () is called
> unconditionally.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vitaly
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
