Ironically, your code looks very similar to what I have done on my end. Can we create a feature request for this?
-----Original Message----- From: Sebastiaan van Erk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:13 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: SingleSortState multiple sorts? I wanted to have this the other day, so I came up with (see attached). I'd like to see your ideas about it, since this was just a 20 minute first hack... IClusterable is just a tagging interface for the sole purpose of clustering via Terracotta. So if you don't need TC, then Serializable should be fine. Regards, Sebastiaan Hoover, William wrote: > I was looking into providing a List<SortParam> in a ISortState/IClusterable > (multiple version of SingleSortState) for a SortableDataProvider. Does the > list within the sort state need to be IClusterable? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
