Many thanks for the clarification.

As I am about to start teaching the rudiments of Wicket to a project team I
guess the teacher should know what they are talking about.

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> you dont need a panel for the repeater itself. as for variable
> component hierarchy inside the repeater itself, you are correct: you
> have to either use a panel or a fragment.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Eric Rotick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I thought I understood the component hierarchy but then I started to
> tell
> >  the guys about it and now I'm not so sure.
> >
> >  If the markup defines a hierarchy as A contains B contains C, in
> effect,
> >  this means that C is added to B which is added to A. If we expand B to
> be
> >  more complex we can use maybe a Panel which we identify as B but inside
> it
> >  is BA , BB and so on. So, all the time there is a direct relationship
> >  between the wicket identified tags in the markup and the components in
> the
> >  code.
> >
> >  Now we introduce a repeater of some kind and it appears that the
> component
> >  hierarchy is broken but it's not. So if C was a repeater and it had 4
> >  children then the hierarchy is still A to B to C but within C there is
> C to
> >  C1, C to C2 and so on.
> >
> >  Now, if we need to have a runtime variable amount of markup which is
> >  variable, not in terms of the same markup repeated but completely
> different
> >  markup based on some logic then we might define a Panel which handles
> the
> >  variation. This is fine but what if the contents of the Panel is also
> >  variable. In this case further Panels are needed until the variable
> >  requirements are covered.
> >
> >  Now the rub; although there are components, such as WebMarkupContainer
> which
> >  can be used to group components, the use of any component which is not
> >  'transparent' must have the related wicket:id in some markup somewhere.
> >
> >  So, lets take an example where we have a list of items which can be
> just
> >  text or a link which has an optional image. It seems that I have to
> define
> >  panels for :-
> >
> >    - wrapper panel for the list
> >    - a link with it's text
> >    - a link with it's text and image
> >
> >  So we have markup such as
> >
> >  <wicket:panel>
> >  <ul>
> >  <li wicket:id="items"/>
> >  </ul>
> >  </wicket:panel>
> >
> >  <wicket:panel>
> >  <span wicket:id="link">
> >  <span wicket:id="text"/>
> >  </span>
> >  </wicket:panel>
> >
> >  <wicket:panel>
> >  <span wicket:id="link">
> >  <span wicket:id="text"/>
> >  <img wicket:id="image"/>
> >   </span>
> >  </wicket:panel>
> >
> >  Have I got this correct or have I gone astray somewhere?
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to