very nice article. well balanced and thoughtful. The more I see the two compared I can't help but think, "People are *insane* if they choose tapestry over wicket."
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:19 AM, cwilkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/os-tapestrywicket/index.html?ca=drs- > > If there's one take home message from it it is in the conclusion: > > "If you try to avoid using XML, or if you just like object-oriented > programming, Wicket could be your choice for day-to-day use. A richer > extensions library also gives a plus to Wicket." > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/IBM-Developerworks-article-comparing-Wicket-and-Tapestry-tp16609075p16609075.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
