Hi, This may be actually a stupid question - am little confused about Fragments use.
Lets say I was extending existing component e.g. DataTable and did not have markup file of my derived component, (I think) in such a case, base class markup file will be used. Assuming that is the case if I wanted to add a fragment (since I would like to lets say add more than just 1 label) which will be a good place to put the fragment? The reason why I use Fragment instead of Panel is because for very small change, having a panel and a separate markup would be a headache and I will have multiple such changes. I dont quiet understand the use of markupProvider being the container instance in Fragment constructor - why could it just have been the class name? It would have been just easy to look up corresponding markup file even if it was a class name. I am assuimg Fragments can reside in any markup file. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Fragment-question-tp16623671p16623671.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
