Dan Kaplan-3 wrote:
>
> Google "jsessionid SEO" for more. Most of the results tell you to get rid
> of the jsessionid. Granted, it doesn't seem google has specifically
> mentioned this either way so all these comments are rumors. But the fact
> of
> the matter is Google *DOES* index your urls with the jessionid still in
> it.
> You'd think they'd be smart enough to remove that, right? If they can't
> get
> that much right, I wouldn't want to make any other assumptions about their
> abilities on similar matters.
>
Search Matt Cutts blog for session id. He specifically suggests to not even
include query string parameters that "look" like session ids. From what I
remember Google can and does index pages with session ids BUT to a reduced
degree.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-jsessionid-for-SEO-tp16464534p16646137.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
