2008/4/28 Uwe Schäfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > James Carman schrieb: > > > > > Or, perhaps Wicket could add in some lifecycle method annotations? > > > > pleeeeeeease don´t! > > using annotations for this kind of lifecycle methods is a simple abuse of > them. non-obvious order, inheritance etc... lesson learned from jpa,ejb3 >
Yes, this would involve making up some rules about the order in which the parent class' initializer methods are invoked. A couple that come to mind: 1. There should only be one initializer method declared per class (to avoid the which do we call first problem). 2. Parent class' initializer methods should be invoked first. I don't agree that marking "lifecycle" methods with annotations is an abuse (of annotations?) at all. Perhaps this wouldn't belong in the "core", but I can see it as an extension or a wicketstuff project maybe? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
