HTML gobbled my <Object> in that last message ... my proposed example was:
class MyPage extends WebPage<Object> Doug Donohoe wrote: > > I'm just now using 1.4. What type of thing is expected for T in > WebPage<T> ? > > It looks like what your model object is. But if your page doesn't use > models (perhaps just it's children do), is the correct thing to do this? > > class MyPage extends WebPage > > I have lots of 'unchecked' and 'raw use' warnings now, so I'd like to know > what the recommended approach is. > > Thanks, > > -Doug > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-1.4-and-generics-tp17115357p17115478.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
