On 5/12/08, Jan Kriesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The 'We wont support this' dogma isn't really proper argumentation. > > Are you providing the 24x7 free support then? > > > > that's actually not the point, is it? i'm trying to help out on the irc > channel as well as good as i can. so you can't claim that all yourself.
I don't do that. I pose that it is very easy to say that feature X must be implemented when you don't have to do anything yourself in supporting feature X. > just get back to serious discussion and don't hide behind this statement > you're repeating over and over. It is a matter of fact: should we support this or not. Support takes time and effort. Failing to acknowledge that and telling us that valuing our own time and effort is not an argument is a serious disrespect IMO. > as i stated, i really appreciate your work - but that doesn't mean one > isn't allowed to formulate (light) criticism. Criticism is fine, but disregarding a valid argument because you don't have to maintain it yourself is not. Martijn -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
