On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Uwe Schäfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maurice Marrink schrieb: >> >> Which security framework do you plan on using? ;) > > *g* actually, it could use a homegrowkn one, which essentially is a bunch of > interfaces (together with a trivial impl). > sorry, that i did not (yet?) choose swarm for frontend permission handling, > but i needed something like that unrelated to the GUI framework used quite > some time ago.
As of 1.3.1 the actual permission handling is completely decoupled from wicket > > feel free, to convert me ;) I am not good at converting people, either you see the light or you don't :P One of the strong points of swarm (imo ;)) is the ease with which it lets you create complex authorization schemes, while still giving the end user full control to create there own user roles. Yes i think a forum warrants a complex authorization scheme :) just thinking of the top of my head i can come up with admins, moderators, power users, users and guests all having different permissions using swarm you can define permissions down to the individual components on the pages (not that you would want to do that on every page :) but you could) administrators can then choose which permissions to grant to each role and or define there own roles. But even if you want to keep it simple you just define 2 roles admin and user and not a single line of code needs to change :) Maurice > > cu uwe > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
