Maybe this can help a little:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6384510
(verified with java 1.5 on mac os x leopard)
Am 21.05.2008 um 11:13 schrieb Martijn Dashorst:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
if we drop that then we can pretty much drop also model
Not sure. I think having Component(String id, IModel<T> model) is a
good thing. However, generifying Component further to get rid of the
cast when doing getModelObject() or getModel() turns out not to be
great.
Because the model goes into the Component and gone is the
generified model.
I don't have a direct problem with that. The generics of Component are
really hard on the eye and the brain. We are trying to make things
simpler and clearer. Having Component(String id, IModel<T> model)
makes things clearer.
For example the DropDownChoice that is generified now makes sure
that i have
a lot less explaining to on this list..
Yes, I am not in favor of dropping DDC(String, IModel<T>,
IModel<List<? extends T>>). I am in favor of dropping the generics
from the Component class definition.
Martijn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
