That won't work for me b'cos I am also passing constructor arguments to the
response Page.
So "new Page()" is actually "new Page(x,y)".
jwcarman wrote:
>
> You could use the bookmarkable version of setResponsePage(). That
> just says what type of page to instantiate.
>
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:51 AM, nitinkc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I am looking to unit test the following:
>>
>> form.add(new AjaxSubmitLink("submitLink"){
>> private static final long serialVersionUID =
>> 3239568065916265026L;
>>
>> @Override
>> protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target,
>> Form form){
>> setResponsePage(new ScheduleEvent(event,
>> resources));
>> }
>>
>> Calling
>> tester.clickLink("submitLink", true);
>>
>> instantiates the ScheduleEvent class. I want to avoid this as it forces
>> me
>> to mock appropriate parameters for ScheduleEvent. All I want to do is
>> check
>> that the rendered page is of type ScheduleEvent. ScheduleEvent class will
>> have it's own unit tests where I want to address issues concerning it.
>> Has
>> anyone done this??
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/unit-testing-setRenderResponse%28new-Page%28%29%29-without-instantiation-of-Page-tp17405981p17405981.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/unit-testing-setRenderResponse%28new-Page%28%29%29-without-instantiation-of-Page-tp17405981p17406699.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
